Student Outlook on the SATs essays

Student Outlook on the SAT's essays The Sat, scholastic assessment test, is used for colleges to measure what a student may be able to do on any given day. Colleges use it as a basis for whom they accept to their college. The SAT is administered by the ETS, or educational testing service. Overall, the SAT is a long, grueling test that tends to cause mostly anxiety among the test-takers. The SAT is a three hour-long test including two ten-minute breaks after Section Two and Section Four. The SAT is divided into 7 sections, which can appear in any order. The sections include: two thirty-minute Verbal sections with analogies, sentence completions, and critical reading, one fifteen minute Verbal section with critical reading, one thirty minute math section with quantitative comparisons and grid-ins, one thirty minute section with regular math, and another fifteen minute section with regular math. Included among the different sections is a thirty-minute experimental section, which could be either math or verbal, but this section does not affect the test-takers score. The SAT is scored on a scale up to 1600, where you can gain a point for a correct answer, but lose a fraction of a point for an incorrect answer. You neither gain nor lose points for omitting a question. Also included in your score is an automatic 200 points on both your Math and Verbal sections. Additionally, at least a C on the SAT is equivalent to an 1100 on the test. The SAT is administered by in a students high school years, but anybody can sign up to take the test. After a survey of random high school students, grades nine through twelve, results proved that older students tend to recognize the importance of the SATs while younger students didnt understand the test as well. Many students believe that the SAT is not an accurate view of how a student will succeed or perform at college level. Students also agreed that colleges should not consider S...

Formatting for Emphasis (From Italics to ALL-CAPS) - Get Proofed!

Formatting for Emphasis (From Italics to ALL-CAPS) - Get Proofed! Formatting for Emphasis In this post, we’ll be looking at four ways to format emphasis in Microsoft Word: italics, bold, underlining, and all-caps. We’ll also look at why you shouldn’t use quote marks for emphasis. 1. Italics In formal writing, italics are the best way to emphasize text. This includes most business writing and academic work. For example, you might find italics used in a textbook like this: That Dickens, always popularizing literary techniques. Here, italicizing â€Å"popularize† highlights the distinction between inventing something and making it popular. Italics can also be used to emphasize key parts of a quotation. If you do this, you also need to show that you’ve changed the formatting in the quoted text: This may not be a reliable interpretation The quote above uses APA rules for adding emphasis, but make sure to check your style guide for how to do this if you’re using a different referencing system. 2. Bold While bold fonts are mostly used for headings and subheadings in formal documents, they are used for emphasis online and in informal writing. This approach to emphasis is very visually striking: Bold formatting. Here, the words â€Å"strobe lighting† have been highlighted so they will stand out even for someone who is skim reading the document. 3. Underlining In the days of typewriters, which didn’t have bold or italic fonts, underlining was the standard way to emphasize text. Now that we have computers, which offer a range of formatting options, this is less common. However, you can still use underlining for emphasis if you want, especially in less formal writing. It can also be useful if you need to emphasize one or two words within a highlighted passage. For example: Underlining in action. In this case, underlining has been used to make â€Å"flying monkeys† stand out from the other bold text. 4. ALL-CAPS You can also emphasize something by capitalizing it, though this can make it SEEM LIKE YOU’RE SHOUTING. This type of emphasis is therefore best saved for when you want something to look loud. Think of all-caps as a textual loudhailer. However, all-caps should not generally be used in formal or academic writing. A Warning About Quotation Marks One common mistake is using quote marks to emphasize a word. For example, you might see a sign outside a shop that says this: Possibly sarcastic? The idea here is to stress the word â€Å"bargain.† But this isn’t correct. And since quote marks can be used to indicate irony (i.e., scare quotes), it could even seem sarcastic! This sign could therefore suggest that the products are overpriced, which is the complete opposite of the intended message. As such, you should avoid using quote marks for emphasis to ensure clarity in your written work.

Investment Appraisal Project Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Investment Appraisal Project - Essay Example WACC=wdkd(1-T)+wpkp+wsks Where   Kd = interest on debt   Kp = cost of preference shares   Ks = cost of shares and retained earnings.   WACC is calculated by multiplying the cost of equity by the market value of the equity and cost of debt by the market value of the debt. Cost of equity can be defined as the minimum rate of return that a company must generate and offer to their investors in order to provide a return on their investment and for assuming some level of risk. If the company does not offer this risk to the investors, there is a chance that the shareholders might sell these shares in the market. Selling of the company shares can be interpreted as a negative sign for the financial outlook of the company and will put a downward impact on the market value of the company. Cost of company’s equity can be calculated through ‘Dividend Growth Model’ and ‘Capital Asset pricing model.’ The formula for dividend growth model is as follows. E = D o Ke - g Where E is the market value of the equity, Do is the recent dividend paid or the dividend projected for the next year, Ke is the cost of the equity and g is the growth rate of the dividend. The dividend growth model assumes that the dividend grows in perpetuity at a definite rate. This growth rate can be computed by observing the historical dividend pattern of the company and calculating the growth rate through simple discount rate formula. Cost of debt is actually the rate at which the present value of the interest payments and redemption amounts equals the current market value of the debt. The following formula further clarifies. Where M is the market value of the bond currently on which it is being traded in the market, i is the interest payment and kd is the rate of return required by the debt holder. From the formula it can easily be deduced that the market value of any bond is the present value of the interest payment. But the above formula is only applicable in the c ase of debt having maturity till perpetuity. In case tax is involved, the interest is taken after tax. Cost of debt is basically the internal rate of return. As provided in the given information, the company’s debt equity ratio is 50%, which means that 50% of its operations are financed through debt and the other half is through equity. The company has available cash balance of ?450,000 and thus, in case the company opts to purchase any of the buildings, it will have to issue bonds by acquiring more debt. Since the company anticipates that the interest rates are likely to be increased in the future, it would be prudent to raise more funds through equity in order to curtail the impact of increased finance charge on the profitability of the company. The project under consideration requires a careful estimation of all the relevant costs and revenues; a misjudgment in the forecast will cause an error in the project net present value, which might result in the acceptance of a proj ect which is not financially viable. CALCULATION BASED ON DISCOUTNED CASHFLOW First, consider the building A which costs ?1,112,000. The following table presents the calculation of the Net Present Value (NPV) of the particular investment decision. Item Amount in ? '000 Years Now 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Cost of the site (1,112) Cash in-flow

Children and Families in UK Policy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Children and Families in UK Policy - Essay Example Secondly, it is a benefit payable to workers via the tax system which leads to increased net income for the concerned. Before 1997, all governments did not deal with family policy explicitly. However, the rest of the Europe highly embraced this. Under New Labour, there has been a tremendous change with regard to family policy. They have adopted the ideas of "social investment" in children. They have also realized that the great changes in family forms and the nature of contributions made by women and men in the families can not be ignored any more (Lewis, 2007). However, family is not an easy territory for these policymakers. Consensus on what a family should look like nowadays remains elusive as politicians find themselves treading on dangerous grounds. They avoid making any judgement regarding sexual morality or intimate relationship forms. Before 1997, the instinct was to look back to the traditional two-parent and married family. This is where the men were to be bread winners while women took care of the home and children. The earliest policy document was titled "Supporting Families." The aim of this approach was to address the changes. They have stopped condemning single mothers as a moral and social problem and a threat. Instead, the major focus has shifted back to that of the 1970s. Labour decided to increase employment rates for these single mothers since they could not provide enough money considering there was only one person providing both care and wages. Labour has been a bit too radical in its mission to address the issues caused by the changing nature of women and men's contribution to families, which is the increase in the increase in women's participation in the labour market. Initially, the UK did not so much concern itself in issues regarding work and family balance, specifically those regarding various types of leave for fathers and mothers and childcare. This has since changed and is now at par with the rest of Europe. Many families now have two incomes since many women also work, although part time in many cases. To respond to this trend, Labour has invested heavily in subsidies for childcare. They have also increased from fourteen weeks to nine months. This is expected to further increase to twelve months by 2010. They have also introduced the right to request flexible working patterns for young children's parents and caretakers of adult dependants. In addition, they have doubled maternity pay. During the initiation of these changes, Labour had a difficult task guarding against becoming a "nanny" state and responding to claims that it was undermining family privacy. The critics particularly did not like Labour to instigate parenthood programmes. Labour has shifted from the false position of the 1980s and early 1990s that parents are the most knowledgeable. It continues to insist on the importance of parental choice in respect to family practices. In particular, the way parents choose to combine care work and employment. However, these family members' interests often conflict. For instance, by men choosing not to do care work, it affects the women's choice to work. This issue of choice more often than not only masks inequality and power in family issues whenever it is applied in family policy. It has been argued that not enough has been done to encourage men to do care work. Giving fathers a "daddy leave" would really help achieve this (NAO,

Circular Dichroism and Secondary Structure of Proteins Essay Example for Free

Circular Dichroism and Secondary Structure of Proteins Essay Proteins are vital to an organism life; they are involved in nearly all cellular functions. It is an essential part of enzymes, the cellular membrane, active transport, protein synthesis and wound healing. Because one relies so heavily upon proteins and its function the structure of proteins is also very important. â€Å"The way a protein will fold over its self-determines how it interacts with other chemicals in its proximity, primarily because of different attractive forces being subjected at specific angles from certain amino acids on the protein’s primary structure and the final shape in the tertiary and quandary structure (Circular dichroism ). † The structure of proteins can range from simple to complex molecules. Proteins may consist of a primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary structure. The secondary structure consists of hydrogen bonds which join amide and carboxyl groups. These bonds aren’t far from the backbone of proteins. This structure is capable of structures such as alpha helicies, beta sheets, and beta turns (Jim, 2007). The physical, secondary structure is important because it helps in determining the activity of a protein. Circular Dichrosim spectroscopy has been identified as prevalent application used in structural biology in determining whether a protein is folded, characterizing its secondary structure, tertiary structure, and the structural family along with other uses as well (Circular dichroism ). Circular dichroism, CD spectroscopy has defined a form of light absorption spectroscopy. It measures the difference in the absorption of circular polarized light by a substance on the right and left. The secondary structure of a protein can be analyzed between the spectrum of approximately 260 and 180 nm. Estimates of secondary proteins can be compared to X-ray crystallography or NMR (Kelly, Jess, C., 2005).The structures identified in this spectrum are the alpha helix, parallel and antiparallel beta sheet, and turns (Berndt, 1996). The only drawback with CD is that even with the implied spectrum, it has been found that there is no exact standard reference spectrum for a pure secondary structure. Synthetic homopolypeptides used to obtain reference spectra are in general, poor models for the secondary structures found in proteins (Berndt, 1996). The CD signal reflect the entire molecular population; it can determines how much of a certain structure and protein contains. It cannot determine the specific residues involved in the alpha-helical portion. In Circular Dichroism a linear polarized light passes through a optically active sample of a protein. This protein has a different absorbance for components. The amplitude of the stronger absorbed component will smaller than that of the less absorbed component. A projection is created of the resulting amplitude. The result is no longer a linear line but and ellipse (PARTHASARATHY, 1985). Different analyses have been developed to help with various contributions that arise from the different types of secondary structures present in a single molecule. The use of reference spectra have been created from known protein structures to help find the overall and secondary structure of unknown proteins (Whitmore A., 2007). â€Å"Recently a new reference dataset of SRCD spectra of proteins of known structure, designed to cover secondary structure and fold space (Berndt, 1996).† Works Cited Berndt, K. D. (1996, May 31). 4.2.1 Circular dichroism spectroscopy. Retrieved October 02, 2012, from 4.2.1 Circular dichroism spectroscopy Circular dichroism . (n.d.). Retrieved October 02, 2012, from APlab: http://www.ap-lab.com/circular_dichroism.htm Jim, C. (2007, August). The Structure of Proteins. Retrieved October 02, 2012, from Chemguide: http://www.chemguide.co.uk/organicprops/aminoacids/proteinstruct.html Kelly, S. M., Jess, T. J., C., P. N. (2005). How to study proteins by circular dichroism. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1751, 119 – 139. PARTHASARATHY, M. (1985). Protein secondary structure from circular dichroism spectra. Proc. Int. Symp. Biomol. Struct. Interactions, 141-149. Whitmore, L., A., W. B. (2007). Protein Secondary Structure Analyses from Circular Dichroism. Biopolymers, 392-400. `

The American Dream in Lorraine Hansberrys A Raisin in the Sun :: A Raisin in the Sun

The American Dream in Lorraine Hansberry's A Raisin in the Sun "A Raisin in the Sun" by Lorraine Hansberry is about living the "American Dream". Hansberry wrote her story in 1959. The "American Dream" that she describes and the one that currently exists are vastly different. In 1959, the dream was to work hard and live a comfortable life. American’s believed that you would live a good life as long as you had your family and had food on the table. Let’s fast forward to 2003. The "American Dream" is to have two cars, a glamorous house, a pool, a 40 hour a week job, and oodles of "stuff". I define stuff as material possessions such as DVD’s, video games, and TV’s. When did the dream go from being happy to having tons of material possessions? I am devising a tipping point strategy to change the "American Dream" back to having a close relationship with your family, working hard, and being happy. By changing the dream, Americans will be happier and have less stress in their life. The new "American Dream" is strongly engraved into the minds of society. It will be difficult to "tip" back the other way. The change will not happen suddenly. It can only happen slowly, and over a long period of time. The change from Hansberry’s dream and the current dream also took years to change. The Law of the Few plays a huge role in changing the dream. To tip the dream in the better direction, some people that are influential in society need to adopt this dream as their own. If a man as successful as Bill Gates decided that he wanted a more laid back, it would do a great deal to attract others to do so as well. In retrospect, if I adopted this dream, no one would care. Bill Gates is considered a connector in our society. He has done much to improve our technology. That is why he would be more likely to cause a "social epidemic" than I would. The second factor that would have to be dealt with in changing the "American Dream" is the stickiness factor. Let’s use Bill Gates as the example again. If he went on TV proclaiming that he was a billionaire, no one would listen. Even if they did listen, they would not remember. If Gates went on TV and said he was only going to work part time and he was going to give most of his money to charity, people would listen.

Ravindra Nath Tagore

The youngest of thirteen surviving children, Tagore was born in the Jorasanko mansion in Calcutta (now Kolkata) of parents Debendranath Tagore (1817–1905) and Sarada Devi (1830–1875).? [†º][11] Tagore family patriarchs were the Brahmo founding fathers of the Adi Dharm faith. He was mostly raised by servants, as his mother had died in his early childhood; his father travelled extensively. [12] Tagore largely declined classroom schooling, preferring to roam the mansion or nearby idylls: Bolpur, Panihati, and others. 13][14] Upon his upanayan initiation at age eleven, Tagore left Calcutta on 14 February 1873 to tour India with his father for several months. They visited his father's Santiniketan estate and stopped in Amritsar before reaching the Himalayan hill station of Dalhousie. There, young â€Å"Rabi† read biographies and was home-educated in history, astronomy, modern science, and Sanskrit, and examined the poetry of Kalidasa. [15][16] He completed major works in 1877, one a long poem of the Maithili style pioneered by Vidyapati.Published pseudonymously, experts accepted them as the lost works of Bhanusi? ha, a newly discovered? [†º] 17th-century Vai ava poet. [17] He wrote â€Å"Bhikharini† (1877; â€Å"The Beggar Woman†Ã¢â‚¬â€the Bengali language's first short story)[18][19] and Sandhya Sangit (1882)—including the famous poem â€Å"Nirjharer Swapnabhanga† (â€Å"The Rousing of the Waterfall†). A prospective barrister, Tagore enrolled at a public school in Brighton, East Sussex, England in 1878.He read law at University College London, but left school to explore Shakespeare and more: Religio Medici, Coriolanus, and Antony and Cleopatra;[20] he returned degreeless to Bengal in 1880. On 9 December 1883 he married Mrinalini Devi (born Bhabatarini, 1873–1902); they had five children, two of whom died before reaching adulthood. [21] In 1890, Tagore began managing his family's vast estates in Shilaidaha, a region now in Bangladesh; he was joined by his wife and children in 1898. In 1890, Tagore released his Manasi poems, among his best-known work. 22] As â€Å"Zamindar Babu†, Tagore criss-crossed the holdings while living out of the family's luxurious barge, the Padma, to collect (mostly token) rents and bless villagers, who held feasts in his honour. [23] These years—1891–1895: Tagore's Sadhana period, after one of Tagore’s magazines—were his most fecund. [12] During this period, more than half the stories of the three-volume and eighty-four-story Galpaguchchha were written. [18] With irony and gravity, they depicted a wide range of Bengali lifestyles, particularly village life.

Gay Marriage Should Be Legal

Gay marriage should be legalized. Our civil rights and the Constitution give us many liberties. One of our civil liberties is the pursuit of happiness, which homosexual people are not allowed to chase. They cannot be married to the person they love and it violates their freedoms. According to professorshouse. com, â€Å"In Alaska, Nevada, Montana, Oregon, Utah, Nebraska, Missouri, Michigan, North Dakota, Ohio, Kentucky, Oklahoma, Kansas, Louisiana, Arkansas, Georgia, Mississippi, Texas, and Alabama, not only is gay marriage banned, but so are civil partnerships.   The 1st amendment of the Constitution states that a person’s religious beliefs or a lack of thereof must be protected. Legislatures also cannot discriminate against marriages of the minority party which, homosexual people fall into that category. There is also an amendment stating there is separation of church and state, so you cannot declare that a marriage is a gift from God. Others might ask why gay marriage sh ould be legalized, but my question is this: why should other people be able to choose who marries who? If a man and a woman get married, no one seems to care.They are two people who feel affection for one another and those two people want to start a family. If we change the scenario a little bit and a man and a man, or a woman and a woman, try to get married it causes uproar. They are not allowed to be married or raise a family together. Imagine waking up one day to a world that was completely opposite from the world we went to sleep in, meaning gay people are now straight and all straight people are now gay. Do you think the newly straight people would fight for the newly homosexual people’s rights?America is the land of the free, but we are not free to marry whomever we would like. After everything straight people have put homosexual people through, in this scenario, homosexual people would most likely vote for their rights because they would want their rights to be voted f or. We are equals in this world whether we are Black, White, Hispanic, Indian, or any other race for that matter. Why should we not be equals based on sexual orientation? In a marriage there is one thing that truly matters: love.Yes, other things are important too, but not one couple would make it to even asking someone to marry them if there was not some love. Las Vegas, Nevada is also known for being the place where many weddings occur which are annulled within one week. These marriages are not based off love, but simply a drunken night in Vegas. High divorce rates weaken what a marriage is defined as. Why are we not able to rewrite what a marriage stands for and make it include a homosexual marriage? The definition of love, according to dictionary. com is as follows: â€Å"Very strong affection: an intense feeling of tender affection and compassion. If gay people feel this way then why shouldn’t they be able to be married? If they are happy with each other, said persons s hould be able to marry. California, Hawaii, New York, and the District of Columbia all have domestic partnership laws and civil partnerships meaning it is almost a marriage without the matrimony. Civil partnerships also give couples the ability to have joint bank accounts, live in the same house, and pay bills together. Homosexual couples are not entitled to this in most states. Marriage benefits should be available to all couples, no matter what.In places where gay marriages are banned, the gay couples are not able to have the same benefits as others. When filing for health care or insurance through a job, gay couples are not able to add each other on. Most loved ones, such as a spouse or a child, in a straight marriage, can make life altering decisions in a hospital if need be. Since gay marriage is not legal, said person’s spouse is not recognized as their next of kin and care is delayed. Who would be affected if homosexual marriage was legalized? No one. Everyone believes there is one person who is out there to love us.Gay people feel the same way. Parenthood is a benefit of marriage and gay couples cannot have children by themselves, without some type of help, so they look to adoption agencies. In some cases gay couples are put on longer waiting lists or denied completely. There are other benefits to being married as well, such as tax breaks. On the website professorshouse. com it reads, â€Å"When we hit our mid-thirties, we wanted only true friendships- friendships that were durable. † This is a perfect example of matrimony and what it should be based on. . According to dictionary. om a marriage is, â€Å"The legal or religious ceremony that formalizes the decision of two people to live as a married couple, including the accompanying social festivities. † If this is a marriage why are gay people not included in this? Even though gay marriage should be legalized, some people have different beliefs. In most religions including, Christ ianity, Islam, and Orthodox Judaism same sex preferences are a sin. People believe in procreation to repopulate the world, but are against gay marriage and homosexuals adopting children because they cannot procreate on their own.If this is a stand point on making or breaking gay marriage then only people who are fertile and want to procreate should be able to get married according to this bias. America has never really given gay marriage a chance, but they believe gay marriage will weaken its institution by leading to high divorce rates. On loveandpride. com I read, â€Å"One reason legislatures are denying gay marriage is because they are fearful that opening the door to allowing gay marriages will open the door to polygamy as well. This would also mean reopening cases about polygamy in the past which they are not willing to do. Others are fearful for children’s futures and they fear being raised by two fathers or by two mothers may compromise children’s mental capac ities. Even though to most people gay marriage should be illegal and should stay in its current state, I believe we need to change the world for future generations. We feared that different religions were going to clash, but now all of the religions coexist. White people had Black and Hispanic slaves, but we overcame the odds and now White men, Black men, and Hispanic men can be equals.If it is possible to overcome such fierce obstacles then we can overcome the boundary obstructing gay marriages and straight marriages alike. Gay marriage should be legalized for these reasons. Evolution will always continue and at any given point in time, something will occur that we will not like in this world, but we can overcome this. Gay marriage is a controversial issue that people have been fighting for years and it has finally come to the surface. We should take charge of it.

Organic vs. Inorganic Food Essay Sample

Organic vs. Inorganic Food Essay Sample Organic vs. Inorganic Food Analysis Essay Organic vs. Inorganic Food Analysis Essay Organic food is the food that has been produced according to the standards designed to maintain natural production. In that way, fewer if any compounds of chemicals are used in the pesticides. Moreover, when chemicals are used in organic food, this is cautiously controlled. Genetically modified organisms have been the topic of heated debate for quite a long time. The opponent scientists argue against the rapidly growing trend inclined towards an almost total shift from the use of organic to genetically modified products. Proponents conversely argue for the benefits of an increased production of genetically modified foods claiming that genetically modified foods ease the burden of costly food production especially in poor countries. Though there have been unjustified speculations on the negative effects of GMO foods, the increased amount of food to feed the growing population is an evident benefit. Opponents base their arguments on the possibility of potential harm resulting from the consumption of genetically modified foods. Among these unproven claims are the ones saying that GM foods contribute to the increase in allergies, make the body resistant to antibiotics, and are possible causes of cancerous cells replication. GMO Food Should Be Extended This essay will take a some-say approach in order to discuss whether organic food has more value than conventional food, but the fact would be that organic foods are better than non-organic foods. The World Bank presented a research on the Agricultural Department in 2009 to assess the amount of income that was used on food in most countries. The report generated surprising results classifying the poorest countries as the highest users of their household income on food. Countries like the US, which have embraced the use of GMOs, were rated among the least users of household income on food. The American government has allowed the growth of GMO crops, and this is what has constantly saved the incomes of its citizens from being largely used up for the purchase of foods. GMO foods are resistant to pests and harsh climatic conditions; they also take a short time to grow, thus reducing food shortage and providing affordable foods. Poor countries should look beyond the unjustified claims about the negative effects of GMOs and focus on generating a dependable source of food to improve their economy. Genetically modified foods are likely to attract the attention of many people for a long period. Various people in different fields are trying to argue out the pros and cons of consuming GMO foods and growing genetically modified crops, but the decision to consume them or not lies in the hands of each individual. Food production for the growing world population is already a problem. With the current changes in climate, this problem is likely to become worse since the increased temperatures coupled with excessive rain will result in increased infestation of pests and diseases. These will, in turn, affect farmers whose yields will go down and the issue of world hunger will continue (Freedman, 2013). The use of genetically modified organisms will undoubtedly assist in solving the hunger problem. Plant scientists are able to match dominant genes in crops to create new varieties of crops that can adapt to the changing climate. This is an advantage that favors poor countries as a result of the large supply of food generated. Genetically engineered crops are able to resist multiple diseases and droughts thus ensuring that in the event of a dry spell, there will still be a reliable source of food (Freedman, 2013). The use of genetically engineered organisms has greatly assisted the farmers especially in the developed countries that have accepted GM crops. GM crops use less pesticide as compared to organic crops thus saving the farmers a lot of money and increasing the yield by enabling them to have a sufficient means of survival. GMO foods are also seen as more advantageous than organic foods since they stay fresh for a longer period and have better taste with added nutritional value (Jeffrey, 2012). Proponent plant scientists are encouraging the world to embrace genetically modified foods, because by doing so, the production of food will greatly increase, therefore the price of foods will go down and the number of people affected by hunger problems will reduce. GMO foods have many advantages that make them a better choice as compared to organic foods. Since pests are one of the greatest sources of losses to farmers, most farmers tend to use lots of pesticides which are undoubtedly hazardous to the environment, in order to protect their crops from the pests. GMO foods are pest resistant; therefore, they do not pose a threat to the environment. They are also safer for the consumers since they do not contain harmful chemicals absorbed from pesticides. Genetically engineered foods are also disease resistant and thus better than vulnerable organic crops since they are not affected by viruses and bacteria which cause many financial losses to farmers. GMO foods have high nutritional benefits. Plant scientists are able to genetically modify organic crops creating stronger crops that have more nutrients than the original ones. This is especially useful in places where the populations rely on one type of food. Such crops may be genetically engineered to allow consumers to try added nutrients and bring down the cases of malnutrition especially in the developing countries. Most GMO foods are developed to stand powerful herbicides, thus are not affected by the harsh chemicals in herbicides. This saves farmers money, which can be used on other needs. In places where cold weather is an issue, crops may be adversely affected by frost which harms young seedlings (Ruppert Henson, 1998). To solve this problem, plant scientists introduced an anti freezing gene which enables GM plants to survive in cold areas. This is good for farmers who live in cold places since they are able to earn a living by growing cold resistant crops. GMO foods are th erefore very advantageous to the world and should be developed rather than prohibited (Whitman, 2000). GMO foods are much cheaper than organic foods. When farmers choose to grow organic foods, they have to deal with problems such as pests, which, in most cases, cause farmers great financial losses by the destruction of produce. Farmers also have to deal with diseases such as potato blight, which affects even future seasons as some remain resistant to herbicides. Such farmers, like potato farmers, are forced to maintain strong herbicides in an attempt to avoid blight on their produce, which is very costly (Rotman, 2013). The world is still facing hunger problems which proponent scientists have attempted to solve through genetic engineering of foods. With the current unpredictable climate, the growth of organic foods proves to be difficult and expensive; therefore, even the actual food produced is very expensive and unavailable to a bigger percentage of the world’s population. Since GMO foods are engineered to withstand the current climate changes that have been attributed to glo bal warming, they will prove to be cheaper to grow purchase. This, therefore, proves their affordability even to people living in poor countries that are more dependent on high-cost organic foods (Connealy, 2013). People who have not yet embraced GMOs do not need to worry too much about safety since scientists have worked tirelessly ensuring that safety standards are met. GMOs are engineered to have better taste, faster growth, high resistance to pests, diseases, and harsh climate; thus they depict positive attributes as compared to organic crops. Where there is a high demand for crops, genetically modified foods are in higher supply and are hence cheaper than organic foods, which take a longer time to grow and remain fresh for a short span These negative attributes of organic crops make them expensive, more perishable, and vulnerable to harsh conditions as compared to genetically modified crops. The ability of plant scientists to transfer genes from different plants enables the organisms to have many desirable traits whereas the organic foods retain both desirable and undesirable traits making genetically modified foods more appealing and reliable both to consumers and farmers (Jeffrey, 2012) . Another advantage of GMO foods is that they help in conserving soil since there is reduced tilling as they require less weeding and cultivation. The use of genetic engineering ensures high levels of production and reduced effort and expenses. When comparing them to organic foods, their advantages greatly outnumber those of organic foods. Growing genetically modified foods saves on capital which may be used to boost the economy especially in the developing countries. The money saved by farmers on purchasing pesticides and other chemicals may be used for their own development in line with non-household products. The Value of Organic Food Some say that organic food is not healthier than conventional produce. Stanford University professional doctors went ahead to determine the value of organic food and found out that there is little evidence that eating organic food can be much healthier than conventional one (Azadi Ho, 2010). Some say that the use of conventional food can indeed lower the exposure to pesticides. However, research has proven that conventional food can do that only within the safety limits. That is to mean that eating organic food including fruits and vegetables has more value than conventional food, because it decreases the exposure to pesticides above safety levels. There are many reasons that lead people to choosing organic foods over conventional foods. These reasons range from environmental concerns to taste preferences. However, supporters of conventional food state that when it comes to individual health, there is not much diversity (Crinnion, 2010). It can be argued that organic foods carry high levels of vitamin C as well as proteins. Therefore, it remains the fact that those people that consume organic foods have a higher advantage of lower risk exposure than those taking conventional foods. Some also state that organic food offers only a little edge towards food safety having 30% of pesticide remains as compared to non-organic foods. However, the fact remains that organic foods are better than conventional ones since they are safe to feed on. Most importantly, both fruits and vegetables that are grown in the absence of chemical fertilizers as well as pesticides are safer than the conventional foods. Moreover, livestock that has been raised using organic practices are not fed with antibiotics or grown using hormones. In addition, it can be stipulated that organic foods are kinder to the environment than conventional foods. That way, organic farming activities are usually designed in order to remain sustainable and emphasize on both conservation and reduction of pollutants (Dangour et.al, 2010). Despite the many arguments against organic foods, it can be deduced that they are healthier than conventional foods due to the fact that studies have indicated that they have a gr eater nutritional value than the conventional products. Some also argue that eating organic food increases one’s exposure to many biological aspects hence putting the person at a high risk of food-borne illnesses. Several concerns have been raised against organic food due to manure, mycotoxins from the molds, and E. coli bacteria. However, organic foods are the best in terms of control of illnesses. They are unlikely to lead to the increased risk of cancer. Any traces of chemicals can also be washed away. Organic food has been proven to be friendly to the environment, because it assists in reduction of pollution as well as greenhouse gases from the production of food through the restrictions on the use of artificial fertilizers and pest control chemicals. Organic farms are also havens for wildlife since they offer homes for bees and butterflies. Moreover, plant, bird, and insect life comprises 50% of organic farmers (Seufert, Ramankutty Foley, 2012). That means that organic farming has taken a large part of the world. Organic food s are grown under the stipulated standards so that animals should be provided a lot of space as well as fresh air in order to grow and thrive with a guarantee of a free-range life. Most importantly, some may complain about the prices of organic foods claiming that they are more expensive than conventional foods. However, organic foods offer many advantages that make them better alternative foods. Organic foods assist in prevention diseases such as cancer and other related heart diseases. Research has shown that organic fruits as well as vegetables have almost 40% of antioxidants that help in reduction of cancer, heart disease, and stroke risks. They also consist of salicylic acids that assist in preventing the hardening of arteries and prevent cancer. It can be deduced that organic food provides more advantages than non-organic foods that are considered as fast-growing. Organic fruits and vegetables are only grown by a few farmers across the world despite the fact that they are in high demand. It is wise to state that organic foods are better than conventional foods due to their high value. Another considerable advantage of organic foods is that they have good tastes along with high nutritious values as compared to other types of foods. They have a notable natural flavor, because they lack additives that give other foods a diverse taste. Recent studies have proven the benefits of organic foods. They have found out that organic foods consist of more mineral salts along with other healthy chemicals than those consisted by non-organic foods. Most importantly, organic foods have the best effect on the reproduction of animals. Many researches have been conducted on animals and revealed that animals fed with organic foods become more reproductive than those fed with non-organic foods (Dangour et.al, 2010). Moreover, one of the main causes of infertility in animals is a large intake of chemicals that are riddled in their foods. It has become clear that organic foods offer better value than conventional food despite the fact that they have been criticized to have a short shelf life due to the lack of additives. Furthermore, organic foods assist in controlling weight in humans and animals. Research has provided that obesity is associated with intake of conventional foods such as canned food and fruits among others due to the preservatives. Obesity has become a major problem among Americans and has provoked continuous debates even at the congress level. It has become confusing if to define obesity as an epidemic. Organic foods assist one to control and maintain their diets. It is clear that the advantages of organic foods outweigh the disadvantages of the same meaning that organic foods are better than conventional ones that have been associated with many health problems across the world, the major ones being cancer and heart diseases. Organic foods can be found from farmers, buying in bulk during the peak seasons or growing organic fruits and vegetables (Crinnion, 2010). One can also breed organic animals for food purposes. Therefore, growing and intake of organic foods should be encouraged across the world in order to ensure that people are safe and healthy. Organic vs. Inorganic Food Debate on which food is healthy for human consumption has been present for many years. The non-organic versus organic argument has been present since the early 1970s. As early as 1970s, biology professors in different universities around the world were skeptical that there were some major benefits of either consuming organic or non-organic food. In the market, there is a wide variety of food which one can choose. People who are conscious of what they eat will always think about what they are ingesting. However, it is commonly agreed that people will always want to eat nutritious, good and healthy foods so as to live long and vigorous lives. The present world is full of cheap and processed foods. Although organic food promises a better life, it is impossible or hard to stick to one food type. This is because both non-organic and organic foods differ significantly. However, organic food is still favored by many people. To understand the contentious issue between organic and inorganic foods, it is essential to understand what they are. To start with, organic foods are food items that are produced or processed without the use of chemicals such as pesticides and fertilizers. On the other hand, inorganic foods are produced with the help of synthetics to get finished products. People believe that organic foods are better than inorganic, but biological test has proved that these two types of foods are almost similar. The pioneers of organic farming saw organic foods as having more life enhancing qualities than the inorganic ones. While there are some heated arguments that encourage the consumption of organic foods, it is still better than regular food that is not organic. In addition, these food items are not genetically modified. In the recent past, organic foods have become increasingly popular. The craze for these food items has swept many nations, and the demand for them is now on the rise. New expensive health food outlets have opened up in many regions and are stocking organic foods only. This has been informed by the recent health related issues. Doctors and nutritionist are encouraging people to change their eating habits by embracing natural diets that have been proved to be healthy. Just like the saying goes, an apple a day keeps the doctor away, a research by Chhabra, Kolli, and Bauer has proved this to be true. According to these researchers, organically grown food provides health benefits to Drosophila melanogaster. As stated in their research findings, organic food market is rapidly growing because of consumer’s perception of superior quality of organic foodstuff. To show that organic products were more balanced in terms of nutritional value than inorganic or conventional foods, they condu cted their research using flies. Their research proved that organic foods provide greater amounts of nutrients which lead to longevity and improved fertility (Chhabra, Kolli, Bauer, 2013). In order to show that organic products provided substantial nutritional benefits, the survival times of starving flies were determined. Flies that were raised on organic food (potato extracts) endured wet starvation considerably longer than those raised on inorganic or conventional extracts. The former also had a higher overall activity than flies that had ordinary diets. The fundamental question that begs to be answered is why flies that were raised on organic extracts didnt show outstanding activity. Was it because of their own developed resistance or because of the food type they were fed? These unsatisfactory questions or issues were addressed by performing preliminary analysis using a simple and convenient model system (Chhabra, Kolli, Bauer, 2013). The research was conducted using Drosophi la melanogaster. Recent studies have proved that this fly can be used to model consequences of disrupted metabolic homeostasis. Therefore, it can be concluded at this point that organic foods have more nutritional value than in-organic ones (Chhabra, Kolli, Bauer, 2013). To show that organic food is better than inorganic, another group of researchers surveyed food patterns among pregnant women. They also investigated dietary quality associated with organic food consumption during pregnancy among women in Norway. This study was aiming at describing dietary characteristics associated with frequent consumption of organic food among pregnant women. In this study, pregnant women who reported frequent consumption of organic or organically produced foods had dietary of the quality that was in line with public advice for healthy and sustainable diets (Torjusen et al., 2013). The importance of quality nutrition during pregnancy is beneficial to both the mother and the child. Preservatives and synthetics used in non-organic foods are addictive and can have adverse effects on the unborn child or the mother (Torjusen et al., 2013). The main finding from this research was that regular intake of organic foods among pregnant women was associated with good health. Women who reported a high consumption of organic food items scored high on the health and sustainability component (PCI). It was evident that an organic diet composed of fruits, vegetables and whole grain is essential for maternal health (Torjusen et al., 2013). However, a proponent of organic food can argue and say that maternal health is determined not only by the dietary consu mption but also by access to health care. The truth of the matter is that a developing fetus depends on the dietary intake of the mother (Torjusen et al., 2013). Another reason for organic food to remain the preferred food type is because the composition of non-organic food remains a misery to many. Non-organic or inorganic foods use synthetics for production purposes. Some of them include pesticides and fertilizers. Additionally, inorganic foods are not safe because producers can modify food items at genetic or molecular level. The use on non-organic food produce has been associated with estrogenic compounds in the body. All organophosphate chemicals from bug spray fertilizers are highly estrogenic. Inside the body, estrogen can cause cancer, uterine fibroids, infertility, or organ malfunctioning. In another research aiming to access the consumer behavior from Moldova area towards organic food, majority of the respondents said that they preferred organic food. According to this research, at the end of 2011, there were more than 37 million certified organic farmers. The largest grow of organic food was in Europe where cultivation of organic f oods increased from 0.8 million hectares to 10 million hectares by the end of 2009 (Stoleru, Munteanu, Jitareanu, 2012). This is a good indicator of the demand for organic food increase. Opponents of organic food claim that when one is growing organic food naturally, there are a lot of contaminations. However, the truth of the matter is that these food items do not utilize chemicals or fertilizers to boost production. Organic food is produced using natural means where even pest control is done using biological methods. Weeding is done mechanically or manually without the use of chemicals such as pesticides of herbicides (Stoleru, Munteanu, Jitareanu, 2012). According to the official information or data from the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of Romania, since 2011, there has been a noticeable increase in organic systems. This has been followed by an explosion of organic food consumption among many people and households. To ensure that consumers are aware of what they are buying, many authorities have made it mandatory for effective labeling of food products. Many countries have introduced the new mandatory EU logo for organic foods (Stoleru, Munteanu, Jitareanu, 2012). As the aim of this research was to access the consumer behavior from Moldova area towards organic food, consumption frequency of organic products indicated most people ate organic foods. 45.13% of the respondents said that they had consumed organic food more than once in a week (Stoleru, Munteanu, Jitareanu, 2012). The most consumed organic food items were fruits, basic products, vegetables and beverages. Someone may point out that organic food is always expensive compared to inorganic. Proponents of inorganic food may claim that production of inorganic foods is cheap. While this is true, people are increasingly becoming conscious of what they eat. They are opting for food products that have no chemicals. Therefore, most people do not consider buying cheap inorganic foods which are full of chemicals (Stoleru, Munteanu, Jitareanu, 2012). Instead, more and more are turning to organic food despite its high price. What most proponents of inorganic food do not remember is that it is always good to prevent a disease than curing. As a result of increased use of chemicals in the production of inorganic foods, a lot of chemicals end up being used. Some of these chemicals are carcinogenic and people end up suffering cancer. Today, treating cancer is very expensive, and this is what people who prefer organic food have realized. For them, it is better buying the expensive organic foods rather than buy the carcinogenic inorganic ones (Stoleru, Munteanu, Jitareanu, 2012). Another study aiming to access consumer attitudes, knowledge and consumption of organic yogurt was conducted. The research findings indicated that most consumers had a positive perception of organic yogurt quality. Most people evaluate organic yogurt more highly than conventional yogurt on the aspects of healthiness, quality, taste safety, packaging, environmental friendliness and trustworthiness (Van Loo, Diem, Pieniak, Verbeke, 2012). Consumers rate the healthiness of organic yogurt as the attribute with the greatest difference between from inorganic yogurt. This is consistent with other studies indicating that health and food safety are the key drivers for organic food purchase. The second largest perceived difference is the perception that organic yogurt is environmentally friendly (Van Loo, Diem, Pieniak, Verbeke, 2012). This is also a good indicator of why organic yogurt has continued to be bought in large amounts. Therefore, it can be concluded that organic products such as yogurt will continue leading in terms of purchases (Van Loo, Diem, Pieniak, Verbeke, 2012). In a research conducted by Murali Gopal, Alka Gupta and George Thomas, soil microbes need food that is provided through recycling Agro wastes. According to this research, if enough compounds can be introduced to the soil through recycling, there is no need to use synthetics such as fertilizers. Increasing evidence is indicating that soil microorganisms are responsible for the provision of food to the world (Gopal, Gupta, Thomas, 2013). However, less importance has been given to satisfy the needs of millions of soil microbes. Carbon presented as soil organic carbon is the food that these microbes eat. In India, hundreds of tons of carbon present in agro-wastes are squandered by burning. Through recycling of agro-wastes, carbon is returned to the soil to provide food for the microbes. Therefore, there is no need of using synthetics or chemicals to produce food (Gopal, Gupta Thomas, 2013). However, one may ask if recycling can control pests in the process of organic food production. T he answer to this question is that there are better methods of controlling pests and weed. Biological control of pests has been known for not only enhancing safe food production, but also to be environmentally friendly. Therefore, there is no doubt that organic food is a better option when compared to inorganic foods (Gopal, Gupta, Thomas, 2013). live CHAT In an effort to prove that inorganic food is better than organic, Rafi Grosglik conducted a research on organic hummus and cultural globalization in Israel. Hummus has become a common food in Israel and its becoming a cultural identity of the country (Grosglik, 2011). It is customary to see organic food representing locality, health, ecology and social justice. It also embodies representations of globalism and westernism. This is because of its addition to the international industrial system and its background among the materialistic social elite in the Western world. The production, distribution and consumption of organic hummus show an increase in its demand. Global socioeconomic situations and concepts entrenched in the model of organic food associated to hummus allow the imagined localization of the dish (Grosglik, 2011). Hummus is a dish assumed to represent earthiness, local simplicity and rootedness. However, in the current context of organic and inorganic, the organic version of hummus wears a symbolic and economic framework. This is not only in Israel but globally. It has been used to demonstrate a symbolic cosmopolitan. In conclusion, this argument of which food type is better for human consumption should come to an end because organic food is the best without any doubts (Grosglik, 2011). Organic foods have an extremely high profile and are continuing to be popular in many grocery stores. People should not be blinded by cheap inorganic foods that have been linked to various cancers. Genetically modified foods have a great impact on the world today. If more countries accepted the consumption of GMO foods, the problem of hunger would be long gone. The number of deaths associated with starvation would reduce considerably, and poor countries would use their income on economic development rather than on household items. Many people would also earn their living through farming regardless of their climatic location since GMO foods are resistant to harsh climatic changes. The issue of environmental conservation would also be boosted since there would be less pollution from pesticides and other farming chemicals resulting from their reduced application. Developing countries should also embrace genetically modified foods to counter the effects of droughts on food production. Genetically modified foods are the solution to many of the food problems facing numerous countries today and should be accepted instead of being rejected. Advantages of organic foods outweigh their disadvantages. Conventional food have been known to cause several illnesses and obesity meaning that overtaking them renders people to high risks of illnesses. Organic foods have also been cited as safe to both humans and animals. Moreover, they are environmentally friendly since they help to control pollution. Organic foods have also been associated with good tastes despite the fact that they are in low supply since they are produced by counted farmers across the world. Therefore, organic foods are better than non-organic.

How To Market A Brand New Feature With Kathryn From CoSchedule

How To Market A Brand New Feature With Kathryn From Organizing new product launches and telling customers about new features can be a daunting task. It can be difficult to know exactly how to market your products and features to your audience, and you might have trouble coming up with just the right language to attract the attention of your target audience. Today, were chatting  with s product marketing lead, Kathryn Nyhus. Kathryn helps organize product launches and comes up with the specific messaging necessary to speak to our varied customers. She’s a super-smart marketing nerd, which helps her fit right in with the team! Kathryn’s background and how it has helped her in her current position at . How Kathryn has helped get  more organized with the implementation of checklists and timelines. How the team comes up with speaking points for a feature. Some of Kathryn’s favorite techniques and methods of marketing a new feature. How segmenting helps the team tailor their marketing emails to the right audiences. How to continue to market a feature once the initial excitement of its launch fades. Kathryn’s best piece of advice for marketers who are launching a new product or feature. Links: Example of  recent product marketing:  4 New (Mind Blowing) Features Launching This Year + 3 You Should Already Be Using! If you liked today’s show, please subscribe on iTunes to The Actionable Content Marketing Podcast! The podcast is also available on SoundCloud,  Stitcher, and Google Play. Quotes by Kathryn: â€Å"Content marketing is the piece that builds the trust and attracts people and product marketing really starts to develop the relationship.† â€Å"Put yourself in the customer’s shoes of asking, Why do I care? Keep asking yourself, But why?† â€Å"Constantly be in contact with your customers.†

Should legal immigration be stopped Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Should legal immigration be stopped - Essay Example It is important to understand the value placed on immigrating to America, especially in the developing countries and even some European nations. The value is so great that these people are sometimes willing to go to all lengths to secure a move. There are many shortcomings of illegal immigration, for example, it results in human trafficking and modern day slavery. Therefore, if the presence of legal immigration contains illegal immigration, then it should not be stopped because its presence reduces suffering. However, there are still cases of illegal immigration despite the presence of legal procedures (Dvorak, 2009). This implies that the problem has to be solved in another way (Egendorf, 2006). Some sources attribute the illegal immigration to hard immigration procedures and limited opportunities, which in turn suggest that the problem can be solved my making immigration easier (Egendorf, 2006). There is also an economic argument for the presence of legal immigration. Due to the procedures that the applicants have to follow, only the best professionals and students make it. This implies that the country gains skilled manpower, which in turn boosts production and creativity (Graham, 2004). Therefore, legal migration is important because it strengthens the American position as a global leader. Attracting the best workers and students from less developed nations leads to ‘brain drain’. These countries will remain stagnated because their best minds migrate overseas instead of contributing to development in their own countries (Williams, 2004). The result is that their homelands remain reliant to international aid. Therefore, it has been proposed that legal migration increases the burden on the United States because the country is forced to make humanitarian contributions to the countries. The only flaw in this proposal is that it has not been tested. It